Vedder Thinking | News Bruce Radke and Michael Waters Quoted in Recent Washington Internet Daily Article
January 3, 2014
Mr. Waters weighs in on the Do-Not-Track (DNT) law by saying the law is the "initial step in the discussion." Eventually, the discussion might extend to the FTC since California's law "does not dictate that companies have to follow the DNT signal," Mr. Waters said. "It just says they have to notify users of how they're going to respond to that signal. In the long run, I don’t know if that’s going to be sufficient for the FTC."
Mr. Radke, chair of the firm's Records Management, eDiscovery and Data Privacy practice group, weighed in by saying "You're probably going to see some legislation in other states," and compared it to the creation of state data breach notification laws in 2002. California was the first state to pass such a law, and in the decade since, nearly every other state has followed, he said. "In some respects, [data breach notification laws] had origins in California and then filtered across the nation," Mr. Radke added. "I think it is very possible you may see a situation similar to the breach notification laws." California has continued to update its data breach notification laws over the past decade. Most recently, the law's definition of "personal information" was expanded, said Mr. Radke, a change that went into effect Wednesday, January 1.
To view the complete article, please download the attachment below.
Reprinted with permission of Warren Communications News Inc.—800-771-9202 or www.warren-news.com. Do not further redistribute without permission.